Back to round index.

Division C Wall Chart

Player	Round 1	Round 2	Round 3	Round 4	Round 5	Round 6	Round 7	Round 8	Round 9	Round 10
1. Fay Spurway	+50 bye 1.0-0.0 +50 = +50	210-385 vs. 6 1.0-1.0 -175 = -125	228-357 vs. 2 1.0-2.0 -129 = -254	212-393 vs. 4 1.0-3.0 -181 = -435	245-388 vs. 3 1.0-4.0 -143 = -578	300-253 vs. 9 2.0-4.0 +47 = -531	254-341 vs. 7 2.0-5.0 -87 = -618	325-358 vs. 5 2.0-6.0 -33 = -651	286-304 vs. 8 2.0-7.0 -18 = -669	1. Fay Spurway
2. Glenda Wright	278-341 vs. 8 0.0-1.0 -63 = -63	+50 bye 1.0-1.0 +50 = -13	357-228 vs. 1 2.0-1.0 +129 = +116	296-375 vs. 6 2.0-2.0 -79 = +37	281-349 vs. 4 2.0-3.0 -68 = -31	242-424 vs. 3 2.0-4.0 -182 = -213	297-387 vs. 9 2.0-5.0 -90 = -303	297-323 vs. 7 2.0-6.0 -26 = -329	253-346 vs. 5 2.0-7.0 -93 = -422	2. Glenda Wright
3. Eugene Van De Walker	391-305 vs. 7 1.0-0.0 +86 = +86	398-268 vs. 5 2.0-0.0 +130 = +216	376-302 vs. 8 3.0-0.0 +74 = +290	+50 bye 4.0-0.0 +50 = +340	388-245 vs. 1 5.0-0.0 +143 = +483	424-242 vs. 2 6.0-0.0 +182 = +665	339-330 vs. 4 7.0-0.0 +9 = +674	317-304 vs. 6 8.0-0.0 +13 = +687	355-265 vs. 9 9.0-0.0 +90 = +777	3. Eugene Van De Walker
4. Priscilla Jones	315-279 vs. 5 1.0-0.0 +36 = +36	343-414 vs. 8 1.0-1.0 -71 = -35	+50 bye 2.0-1.0 +50 = +15	393-212 vs. 1 3.0-1.0 +181 = +196	349-281 vs. 2 4.0-1.0 +68 = +264	410-307 vs. 6 5.0-1.0 +103 = +367	330-339 vs. 3 5.0-2.0 -9 = +358	313-299 vs. 9 6.0-2.0 +14 = +372	329-331 vs. 7 6.0-3.0 -2 = +370	4. Priscilla Jones
5. Nena Rossi	279-315 vs. 4 0.0-1.0 -36 = -36	268-398 vs. 3 0.0-2.0 -130 = -166	395-232 vs. 9 1.0-2.0 +163 = -3	364-334 vs. 7 2.0-2.0 +30 = +27	258-441 vs. 6 2.0-3.0 -183 = -156	316-373 vs. 8 2.0-4.0 -57 = -213	+50 bye 3.0-4.0 +50 = -163	358-325 vs. 1 4.0-4.0 +33 = -130	346-253 vs. 2 5.0-4.0 +93 = -37	5. Nena Rossi
6. Jean Ellenor	347-222 vs. 9 1.0-0.0 +125 = +125	385-210 vs. 1 2.0-0.0 +175 = +300	348-289 vs. 7 3.0-0.0 +59 = +359	375-296 vs. 2 4.0-0.0 +79 = +438	441-258 vs. 5 5.0-0.0 +183 = +621	307-410 vs. 4 5.0-1.0 -103 = +518	346-336 vs. 8 6.0-1.0 +10 = +528	304-317 vs. 3 6.0-2.0 -13 = +515	+50 bye 7.0-2.0 +50 = +565	6. Jean Ellenor
7. Betty Lovewell	305-391 vs. 3 0.0-1.0 -86 = -86	400-245 vs. 9 1.0-1.0 +155 = +69	289-348 vs. 6 1.0-2.0 -59 = +10	334-364 vs. 5 1.0-3.0 -30 = -20	286-450 vs. 8 1.0-4.0 -164 = -184	+50 bye 2.0-4.0 +50 = -134	341-254 vs. 1 3.0-4.0 +87 = -47	323-297 vs. 2 4.0-4.0 +26 = -21	331-329 vs. 4 5.0-4.0 +2 = -19	7. Betty Lovewell
8. Diane Stanish	341-278 vs. 2 1.0-0.0 +63 = +63	414-343 vs. 4 2.0-0.0 +71 = +134	302-376 vs. 3 2.0-1.0 -74 = +60	470-252 vs. 9 3.0-1.0 +218 = +278	450-286 vs. 7 4.0-1.0 +164 = +442	373-316 vs. 5 5.0-1.0 +57 = +499	336-346 vs. 6 5.0-2.0 -10 = +489	+50 bye 6.0-2.0 +50 = +539	304-286 vs. 1 7.0-2.0 +18 = +557	8. Diane Stanish
9. Gail Losier	222-347 vs. 6 0.0-1.0 -125 = -125	245-400 vs. 7 0.0-2.0 -155 = -280	232-395 vs. 5 0.0-3.0 -163 = -443	252-470 vs. 8 0.0-4.0 -218 = -661	+50 bye 1.0-4.0 +50 = -611	253-300 vs. 1 1.0-5.0 -47 = -658	387-297 vs. 2 2.0-5.0 +90 = -568	299-313 vs. 4 2.0-6.0 -14 = -582	265-355 vs. 3 2.0-7.0 -90 = -672	9. Gail Losier

This report was generated by tsh version 3.320. For more information about tsh, please contact John Chew.